Featured

Paid Family Leave Benefits are Taxable (and other news)

For more than two years now, we’ve spoken and presented to various groups on New York’s Paid Family Leave Benefits Law (PFL), dozens, and dozens, and dozens of times. Like clockwork, one of the curious attendees would always ask whether PFL benefit payments would be taxable and whether PFL employee contributions would be pre- or post-tax deductions. Each time, we’d be forced to answer something along the lines of, “we don’t know yet— reasonable minds can disagree, and we are waiting on promised guidance on this from the state.” Well, throw that old answer out; we now know! The answers are the seemingly incongruous “taxable” and “post-tax.”

Continue reading

Featured

Final Paid Family Leave Rules Issued in New York

With less than six months until the roll out of Paid Family Leave (PFL) in New York, the Workers Compensation Board (WCB) has released the final rules implementing the PFL Benefits Law. 

Continue reading

Featured

Paid Family Leave Employee Contribution Rate for 2018 Published

The Department of Financial Services (DFS) has issued a much-anticipated document setting the maximum employee contribution to pay for New York Paid Family Leave (PFL) at 0.126% of an employee’s weekly wage, up to the statewide average weekly wage.  With a current average weekly wage of $1,305.92, this means that employee contributions will initially be capped at $1.65 per week.

Continue reading

Featured

Workers Compensation Board Issues Proposed New York Paid Family Leave Rules, Take Two

Back in February, proposed regulations for New York’s Paid Family Leave Benefits Law were issued by the Workers Compensation Board (WCB). Today, the WCB released a revised set of proposed regulations containing some minor and a few substantial changes.

Continue reading

Featured

Recent FCRA Data Breach Class Action Decision: Statutory violations may be enough to establish Article III standing

In a recent decision, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the lower court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss and held that class action plaintiffs had Article III standing on the basis of their data security Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) claims.

Continue reading