Down But Not Out - States Point the Way to How the FTC Might Recover from the 11th Circuit’s LabMD Decision

In a classic story of “it’s never over until it’s over,” cybersecurity David LabMD challenged the FTC’s Goliathan ability to issue sweeping orders in relation to security concerns under Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act.  LabMD had lost its challenge of the FTC’s underlying authority to issue such orders, but continued in its fight, ultimately challenging the wording of the FTC’s form order itself.  And LabMD ultimately won in a landmark decision that can be found here.

States have been following a parallel enforcement track to the FTC, issuing their own orders under their Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices (“UDAP”) acts, otherwise known as “little FTC” acts.  The states, however, may have already created a way for the FTC to have its cake and eat it too in light of the 11th Circuit’s decision:  be more specific in its enforcement orders, and perhaps limit their temporal scope.  HSE Privacy and Data Security chair, F. Paul Greene, and team member Daniel J. Altieri, discuss these developments in detail in the New York Law Journal article linked below.

view 11th Circuit Decision in LabMD Case Could Have Repercussions Beyond the FTC PDF

Second Equifax Employee Charged with Insider Tradi...

Disclaimer

This website presents only general information not intended as legal advice. Although we encourage calls, letters and emails from prospective clients, please keep in mind that merely contacting Harter Secrest & Emery LLP (HSE) does not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Confidential information should not be sent to HSE until you have been notified in writing by HSE that a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Information sent to us before then may not be treated as confidential by HSE or the court.

I have read this and agree     Cancel