Yesterday, the New York State Department of Financial Services released the final version of its new cybersecurity regulations, to be promulgated at 23 N.Y.C.R.R. Part 500, making some incremental changes against its last version, released on December 28, 2016.
New York Temporarily Allows Remote Witnessing of Wills and Other Documents in Response to COVID-19 Pandemic
On January 25, 2017, in Brown Jordan Int’l, Inc. v. Carmicle (No. 16-11350), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that expenses incurred by an employer while responding to the unauthorized access of company email accounts by a former employee, even absent an interruption of service, qualify as a “loss” under the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). In doing so, the Eleventh Circuit broadly interpreted the CFAA, which permits civil actions only under specific circumstances, including instances when an individual “intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access, and thereby obtains … information from any protected computer” resulting in a “loss” during any 1-year period of at least $5,000.
Just days after the IRS released its recent alert concerning W-2 phishing scams (which can be found here), the College of Southern Idaho (“CSI”) reported that it too has become a victim.
On January 9, 2017, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) announced its first enforcement action under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) involving delayed data breach reporting. HHS settled alleged violations of the HIPAA breach notification rule committed by Presence Health, one of the largest health care networks in Illinois. The settlement agreement called for Presence Health to pay $475,000 and to adopt a corrective action plan. This settlement underscores the importance of understanding your organization’s HIPAA policies and procedures, and raises several practical considerations going forward.